90 lines
4.3 KiB
C
90 lines
4.3 KiB
C
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
// Name: thread.h
|
|
// Purpose: topic overview
|
|
// Author: wxWidgets team
|
|
// Licence: wxWindows licence
|
|
/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
NOTE: we explicitly don't name wxMutexGUIEnter() and wxMutexGUILeave()
|
|
as they're not safe. See also ticket #10366.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
@page overview_thread Multithreading Overview
|
|
|
|
@tableofcontents
|
|
|
|
wxWidgets provides a complete set of classes encapsulating objects necessary in
|
|
multi-threaded (MT) applications: the wxThread class itself and different
|
|
synchronization objects: mutexes (see wxMutex) and critical sections (see
|
|
wxCriticalSection) with conditions (see wxCondition). The thread API in
|
|
wxWidgets resembles to POSIX1.c threads API (a.k.a. pthreads), although several
|
|
functions have different names and some features inspired by Win32 thread API
|
|
are there as well.
|
|
|
|
These classes hopefully make writing MT programs easier and they also provide
|
|
some extra error checking (compared to the native - be it Win32 or Posix -
|
|
thread API), however it is still a non-trivial undertaking especially for large
|
|
projects. Before starting an MT application (or starting to add MT features to
|
|
an existing one) it is worth asking oneself if there is no easier and safer way
|
|
to implement the same functionality. Of course, in some situations threads
|
|
really make sense (classical example is a server application which launches a
|
|
new thread for each new client), but in others it might be an overkill. On the
|
|
other hand, the recent evolution of the computer hardware shows an important
|
|
trend towards multi-core systems, which are better exploited using multiple
|
|
threads (e.g. you may want to split a long task among as many threads as many
|
|
CPU (cores) the system reports; see wxThread::GetCPUCount).
|
|
|
|
To implement non-blocking operations @e without using multiple threads you have
|
|
two possible implementation choices:
|
|
|
|
- use wxIdleEvent (e.g. to perform a long calculation while updating a progress dialog)
|
|
- do everything at once but call wxWindow::Update() or wxApp::YieldFor(wxEVT_CATEGORY_UI)
|
|
periodically to update the screen.
|
|
|
|
If instead you choose to use threads in your application, please read the
|
|
following section of this overview.
|
|
|
|
@see wxThread, wxThreadHelper, wxMutex, wxCriticalSection, wxCondition,
|
|
wxSemaphore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@section overview_thread_notes Important Notes for Multi-threaded Applications
|
|
|
|
When writing a multi-threaded application, it is strongly recommended that
|
|
<b>no secondary threads call GUI functions</b>. The design which uses one GUI
|
|
thread and several worker threads which communicate with the main one using
|
|
@b events is much more robust and will undoubtedly save you countless problems
|
|
(example: under Win32 a thread can only access GDI objects such as pens,
|
|
brushes, device contexts created by itself and not by the other threads).
|
|
|
|
For communication between secondary threads and the main thread, you may use
|
|
wxEvtHandler::QueueEvent or its short version ::wxQueueEvent. These functions
|
|
have a thread-safe implementation so that they can be used as they are for
|
|
sending events from one thread to another. However there is no built in method
|
|
to send messages to the worker threads and you will need to use the available
|
|
synchronization classes to implement the solution which suits your needs
|
|
yourself. In particular, please note that it is not enough to derive your class
|
|
from wxThread and wxEvtHandler to send messages to it: in fact, this does not
|
|
work at all. You're instead encouraged to use wxThreadHelper as it greatly
|
|
simplifies the communication and the sharing of resources.
|
|
|
|
You should also look at the wxThread docs for important notes about secondary
|
|
threads and their deletion.
|
|
|
|
Last, remember that if wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() is used directly or
|
|
indirectly (e.g. through wxProgressDialog) in your code, then you may have both
|
|
re-entrancy problems and also problems caused by the processing of events out
|
|
of order. To resolve the last problem wxThreadEvent can be used: thanks to its
|
|
implementation of the wxThreadEvent::GetEventCategory function wxThreadEvent
|
|
classes in fact do not get processed by wxEventLoopBase::YieldFor() unless you
|
|
specify the @c wxEVT_CATEGORY_THREAD flag.
|
|
|
|
See also the @sample{thread} for a sample showing some simple interactions
|
|
between the main and secondary threads.
|
|
|
|
*/
|