nixos: nixos/doc/manual/development/option-declarations.xml to CommonMark

This commit is contained in:
Bobby Rong 2021-07-03 22:14:03 +08:00
parent 401578ed7e
commit 6877012179
4 changed files with 340 additions and 200 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
# Option Declarations {#sec-option-declarations}
An option declaration specifies the name, type and description of a
NixOS configuration option. It is invalid to define an option that
hasn't been declared in any module. An option declaration generally
looks like this:
```nix
options = {
name = mkOption {
type = type specification;
default = default value;
example = example value;
description = "Description for use in the NixOS manual.";
};
};
```
The attribute names within the `name` attribute path must be camel
cased in general but should, as an exception, match the [ package
attribute name](https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#sec-package-naming)
when referencing a Nixpkgs package. For example, the option
`services.nix-serve.bindAddress` references the `nix-serve` Nixpkgs
package.
The function `mkOption` accepts the following arguments.
`type`
: The type of the option (see [](#sec-option-types)). It may be
omitted, but that's not advisable since it may lead to errors that
are hard to diagnose.
`default`
: The default value used if no value is defined by any module. A
default is not required; but if a default is not given, then users
of the module will have to define the value of the option, otherwise
an error will be thrown.
`example`
: An example value that will be shown in the NixOS manual.
`description`
: A textual description of the option, in DocBook format, that will be
included in the NixOS manual.
## Extensible Option Types {#sec-option-declarations-eot}
Extensible option types is a feature that allow to extend certain types
declaration through multiple module files. This feature only work with a
restricted set of types, namely `enum` and `submodules` and any composed
forms of them.
Extensible option types can be used for `enum` options that affects
multiple modules, or as an alternative to related `enable` options.
As an example, we will take the case of display managers. There is a
central display manager module for generic display manager options and a
module file per display manager backend (sddm, gdm \...).
There are two approach to this module structure:
- Managing the display managers independently by adding an enable
option to every display manager module backend. (NixOS)
- Managing the display managers in the central module by adding an
option to select which display manager backend to use.
Both approaches have problems.
Making backends independent can quickly become hard to manage. For
display managers, there can be only one enabled at a time, but the type
system can not enforce this restriction as there is no relation between
each backend `enable` option. As a result, this restriction has to be
done explicitely by adding assertions in each display manager backend
module.
On the other hand, managing the display managers backends in the central
module will require to change the central module option every time a new
backend is added or removed.
By using extensible option types, it is possible to create a placeholder
option in the central module
([Example: Extensible type placeholder in the service module](#ex-option-declaration-eot-service)),
and to extend it in each backend module
([Example: Extending `services.xserver.displayManager.enable` in the `gdm` module](#ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm),
[Example: Extending `services.xserver.displayManager.enable` in the `sddm` module](#ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm)).
As a result, `displayManager.enable` option values can be added without
changing the main service module file and the type system automatically
enforce that there can only be a single display manager enabled.
::: {#ex-option-declaration-eot-service .example}
::: {.title}
**Example: Extensible type placeholder in the service module**
:::
```nix
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
description = "Display manager to use";
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ ]);
};
```
:::
::: {#ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm .example}
::: {.title}
**Example: Extending `services.xserver.displayManager.enable` in the `gdm` module**
:::
```nix
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "gdm" ]);
};
```
:::
::: {#ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm .example}
::: {.title}
**Example: Extending `services.xserver.displayManager.enable` in the `sddm` module**
:::
```nix
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "sddm" ]);
};
```
:::
The placeholder declaration is a standard `mkOption` declaration, but it
is important that extensible option declarations only use the `type`
argument.
Extensible option types work with any of the composed variants of `enum`
such as `with types; nullOr (enum [ "foo" "bar" ])` or `with types;
listOf (enum [ "foo" "bar" ])`.

View file

@ -1,199 +0,0 @@
<section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"
version="5.0"
xml:id="sec-option-declarations">
<title>Option Declarations</title>
<para>
An option declaration specifies the name, type and description of a NixOS
configuration option. It is invalid to define an option that hasnt been
declared in any module. An option declaration generally looks like this:
<programlisting>
options = {
<replaceable>name</replaceable> = mkOption {
type = <replaceable>type specification</replaceable>;
default = <replaceable>default value</replaceable>;
example = <replaceable>example value</replaceable>;
description = "<replaceable>Description for use in the NixOS manual.</replaceable>";
};
};
</programlisting>
The attribute names within the <replaceable>name</replaceable> attribute path
must be camel cased in general but should, as an exception, match the
<link
xlink:href="https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#sec-package-naming">
package attribute name</link> when referencing a Nixpkgs package. For
example, the option <varname>services.nix-serve.bindAddress</varname>
references the <varname>nix-serve</varname> Nixpkgs package.
</para>
<para>
The function <varname>mkOption</varname> accepts the following arguments.
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>type</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The type of the option (see <xref linkend='sec-option-types' />). It may
be omitted, but thats not advisable since it may lead to errors that
are hard to diagnose.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>default</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The default value used if no value is defined by any module. A default is
not required; but if a default is not given, then users of the module
will have to define the value of the option, otherwise an error will be
thrown.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>example</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
An example value that will be shown in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<varname>description</varname>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
A textual description of the option, in DocBook format, that will be
included in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
</para>
<section xml:id="sec-option-declarations-eot">
<title>Extensible Option Types</title>
<para>
Extensible option types is a feature that allow to extend certain types
declaration through multiple module files. This feature only work with a
restricted set of types, namely <literal>enum</literal> and
<literal>submodules</literal> and any composed forms of them.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types can be used for <literal>enum</literal> options that
affects multiple modules, or as an alternative to related
<literal>enable</literal> options.
</para>
<para>
As an example, we will take the case of display managers. There is a central
display manager module for generic display manager options and a module file
per display manager backend (sddm, gdm ...).
</para>
<para>
There are two approach to this module structure:
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers independently by adding an enable option to
every display manager module backend. (NixOS)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers in the central module by adding an option
to select which display manager backend to use.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
</para>
<para>
Both approaches have problems.
</para>
<para>
Making backends independent can quickly become hard to manage. For display
managers, there can be only one enabled at a time, but the type system can
not enforce this restriction as there is no relation between each backend
<literal>enable</literal> option. As a result, this restriction has to be
done explicitely by adding assertions in each display manager backend
module.
</para>
<para>
On the other hand, managing the display managers backends in the central
module will require to change the central module option every time a new
backend is added or removed.
</para>
<para>
By using extensible option types, it is possible to create a placeholder
option in the central module
(<xref linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-service'
/>), and to extend
it in each backend module
(<xref
linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm' />,
<xref
linkend='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm' />).
</para>
<para>
As a result, <literal>displayManager.enable</literal> option values can be
added without changing the main service module file and the type system
automatically enforce that there can only be a single display manager
enabled.
</para>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-service'>
<title>Extensible type placeholder in the service module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
description = "Display manager to use";
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm'>
<title>Extending <literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the <literal>gdm</literal> module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "gdm" ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<example xml:id='ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm'>
<title>Extending <literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the <literal>sddm</literal> module</title>
<screen>
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ "sddm" ]);
};</screen>
</example>
<para>
The placeholder declaration is a standard <literal>mkOption</literal>
declaration, but it is important that extensible option declarations only
use the <literal>type</literal> argument.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types work with any of the composed variants of
<literal>enum</literal> such as <literal>with types; nullOr (enum [ "foo"
"bar" ])</literal> or <literal>with types; listOf (enum [ "foo" "bar"
])</literal>.
</para>
</section>
</section>

View file

@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ in {
}
</programlisting>
</example>
<xi:include href="option-declarations.xml" />
<xi:include href="../from_md/development/option-declarations.section.xml" />
<xi:include href="option-types.xml" />
<xi:include href="option-def.xml" />
<xi:include href="../from_md/development/assertions.section.xml" />

View file

@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
<section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xml:id="sec-option-declarations">
<title>Option Declarations</title>
<para>
An option declaration specifies the name, type and description of a
NixOS configuration option. It is invalid to define an option that
hasnt been declared in any module. An option declaration generally
looks like this:
</para>
<programlisting language="bash">
options = {
name = mkOption {
type = type specification;
default = default value;
example = example value;
description = &quot;Description for use in the NixOS manual.&quot;;
};
};
</programlisting>
<para>
The attribute names within the <literal>name</literal> attribute
path must be camel cased in general but should, as an exception,
match the
<link xlink:href="https://nixos.org/nixpkgs/manual/#sec-package-naming">
package attribute name</link> when referencing a Nixpkgs package.
For example, the option
<literal>services.nix-serve.bindAddress</literal> references the
<literal>nix-serve</literal> Nixpkgs package.
</para>
<para>
The function <literal>mkOption</literal> accepts the following
arguments.
</para>
<variablelist>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<literal>type</literal>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The type of the option (see
<xref linkend="sec-option-types" />). It may be omitted, but
thats not advisable since it may lead to errors that are hard
to diagnose.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<literal>default</literal>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
The default value used if no value is defined by any module. A
default is not required; but if a default is not given, then
users of the module will have to define the value of the
option, otherwise an error will be thrown.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<literal>example</literal>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
An example value that will be shown in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term>
<literal>description</literal>
</term>
<listitem>
<para>
A textual description of the option, in DocBook format, that
will be included in the NixOS manual.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</variablelist>
<section xml:id="sec-option-declarations-eot">
<title>Extensible Option Types</title>
<para>
Extensible option types is a feature that allow to extend certain
types declaration through multiple module files. This feature only
work with a restricted set of types, namely
<literal>enum</literal> and <literal>submodules</literal> and any
composed forms of them.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types can be used for <literal>enum</literal>
options that affects multiple modules, or as an alternative to
related <literal>enable</literal> options.
</para>
<para>
As an example, we will take the case of display managers. There is
a central display manager module for generic display manager
options and a module file per display manager backend (sddm, gdm
...).
</para>
<para>
There are two approach to this module structure:
</para>
<itemizedlist>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers independently by adding an
enable option to every display manager module backend. (NixOS)
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
Managing the display managers in the central module by adding
an option to select which display manager backend to use.
</para>
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
<para>
Both approaches have problems.
</para>
<para>
Making backends independent can quickly become hard to manage. For
display managers, there can be only one enabled at a time, but the
type system can not enforce this restriction as there is no
relation between each backend <literal>enable</literal> option. As
a result, this restriction has to be done explicitely by adding
assertions in each display manager backend module.
</para>
<para>
On the other hand, managing the display managers backends in the
central module will require to change the central module option
every time a new backend is added or removed.
</para>
<para>
By using extensible option types, it is possible to create a
placeholder option in the central module
(<link linkend="ex-option-declaration-eot-service">Example:
Extensible type placeholder in the service module</link>), and to
extend it in each backend module
(<link linkend="ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm">Example:
Extending
<literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the
<literal>gdm</literal> module</link>,
<link linkend="ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm">Example:
Extending
<literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the
<literal>sddm</literal> module</link>).
</para>
<para>
As a result, <literal>displayManager.enable</literal> option
values can be added without changing the main service module file
and the type system automatically enforce that there can only be a
single display manager enabled.
</para>
<anchor xml:id="ex-option-declaration-eot-service" />
<para>
<emphasis role="strong">Example: Extensible type placeholder in
the service module</emphasis>
</para>
<programlisting language="bash">
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
description = &quot;Display manager to use&quot;;
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ ]);
};
</programlisting>
<anchor xml:id="ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-gdm" />
<para>
<emphasis role="strong">Example: Extending
<literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the
<literal>gdm</literal> module</emphasis>
</para>
<programlisting language="bash">
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ &quot;gdm&quot; ]);
};
</programlisting>
<anchor xml:id="ex-option-declaration-eot-backend-sddm" />
<para>
<emphasis role="strong">Example: Extending
<literal>services.xserver.displayManager.enable</literal> in the
<literal>sddm</literal> module</emphasis>
</para>
<programlisting language="bash">
services.xserver.displayManager.enable = mkOption {
type = with types; nullOr (enum [ &quot;sddm&quot; ]);
};
</programlisting>
<para>
The placeholder declaration is a standard
<literal>mkOption</literal> declaration, but it is important that
extensible option declarations only use the
<literal>type</literal> argument.
</para>
<para>
Extensible option types work with any of the composed variants of
<literal>enum</literal> such as
<literal>with types; nullOr (enum [ &quot;foo&quot; &quot;bar&quot; ])</literal>
or
<literal>with types; listOf (enum [ &quot;foo&quot; &quot;bar&quot; ])</literal>.
</para>
</section>
</section>