This commit fixes a papercut in nixos-rebuild where people wanting to
switch to a specialisation (or test one) were forced to manually figure
out the specialisation's path and run its activation script - since now,
there's a dedicated option to do just that.
This is a backwards-compatible change which doesn't affect the existing
behavior, which - to be fair - might still be considered sus by some
people, the painful scenario here being:
- you boot into specialisation `foo`,
- you run `nixos-rebuild switch`,
- whoops, you're no longer at specialisation `foo`, but you're rather
brought back to the base system.
(it's especially painful for cases where specialisation is used to load
extra drivers, e.g. Nvidia, since then launching `nixos-rebuild switch`,
while forgetting that you're inside a specialisation, can cause some
parts of your system to get accidentally unloaded.)
I've tried to mitigate that by improving specialisations so that they
create a dedicated file somewhere in `/run/current-system` containing
the specialisation's name (which `nixos-rebuild` could then use as the
default value for `--specialisation`), but I haven't been able to come
up with anything working (plus it would be a breaking change then).
Closes https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/174065
This commit upgrades headscale to the newest version, 0.17.0 and updates
the module with the current breaking config changes.
In addition, the module is rewritten to conform with RFC0042 to try to
prevent some drift between the module and the upstream.
A new maintainer, Misterio77, is added as maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Dalby <kristoffer@tailscale.com>
Co-authored-by: Gabriel Fontes <hi@m7.rs>
Co-authored-by: Geoffrey Huntley <ghuntley@ghuntley.com>
On x86_64-linux only because bootspec is for NixOS (for the moment?),
and NixOS is really only a Linux concept (for the moment?).
Not on aarch64-linux because it fails for whatever reason 🤷
This splits the tests into two: one where cups.socket is started
normally, the order with socket activation.
Why? It's almost impossible to follow the test with 4 different
machines printing at the same time. It should also be more efficient
because only two VMs at a time were needed anyway.
