Commit graph

32 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zettat123 8848b0ea2b
Fix bugs in rerunning jobs (#29955)
Fix #28761
Fix #27884
Fix #28093

## Changes

### Rerun all jobs
When rerun all jobs, status of the jobs with `needs` will be set to
`blocked` instead of `waiting`. Therefore, these jobs will not run until
the required jobs are completed.

### Rerun a single job
When a single job is rerun, its dependents should also be rerun, just
like GitHub does
(https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28761#issuecomment-2008620820).
In this case, only the specified job will be set to `waiting`, its
dependents will be set to `blocked` to wait the job.

### Show warning if every job has `needs`
If every job in a workflow has `needs`, all jobs will be blocked and no
job can be run. So I add a warning message.

<img
src="https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/15528715/88f43511-2360-465d-be96-ee92b57ff67b"
width="480px" />

(cherry picked from commit 2f060c5834d81f0317c795fc281f9a07e03e5962)
2024-03-26 19:04:26 +01:00
ChristopherHX 66632c4958
Actions Artifacts v4 backend (#28965)
Fixes #28853

Needs both https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/473 and
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/471 on the runner side and
patched `actions/upload-artifact@v4` / `actions/download-artifact@v4`,
like `christopherhx/gitea-upload-artifact@v4` and
`christopherhx/gitea-download-artifact@v4`, to not return errors due to
GHES not beeing supported yet.

(cherry picked from commit a53d268aca87a281aadc2246541f8749eddcebed)
2024-03-06 12:10:45 +08:00
sillyguodong 997350a68d
Not trigger all jobs any more, when re-running the first job (#29439)
Previously, it will be treated as "re-run all jobs" when `jobIndex ==
0`. So when you click re-run button on the first job, it triggers all
the jobs actually.

(cherry picked from commit bad4ad70181c747599e206c0e7a87b57c997385d)
2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
Lunny Xiao 894d9b2836
Move context from modules to services (#29440)
Since `modules/context` has to depend on `models` and many other
packages, it should be moved from `modules/context` to
`services/context` according to design principles. There is no logic
code change on this PR, only move packages.

- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/context` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context`
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/contexttest` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/contexttest` because of depending on
context
- Move `code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/upload` to
`code.gitea.io/gitea/services/context/upload` because of depending on
context

(cherry picked from commit 29f149bd9f517225a3c9f1ca3fb0a7b5325af696)

Conflicts:
	routers/api/packages/alpine/alpine.go
	routers/api/v1/repo/issue_reaction.go
	routers/install/install.go
	routers/web/admin/config.go
	routers/web/passkey.go
	routers/web/repo/search.go
	routers/web/repo/setting/default_branch.go
	routers/web/user/home.go
	routers/web/user/profile.go
	tests/integration/editor_test.go
	tests/integration/integration_test.go
	tests/integration/mirror_push_test.go
	trivial context conflicts
	also modified all other occurrences in Forgejo specific files
2024-03-06 12:10:43 +08:00
Gusted d0e5af7079 Merge pull request '[UI] Actions: Link to Workflow in View' (#1866) from n0toose/forgejo:forgejo-add-workflow-link into forgejo
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/1866
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
2024-02-28 17:28:16 +00:00
Gergely Nagy 9372bdd4a3
Move permission check from ArtifactsDeleteView to the route
As suggested by @Gusted in #2431, move the permission checking from
`ArtifactsDeleteView` into the route instead, where it belongs.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-02-25 10:52:11 +01:00
FuXiaoHei c551d3f3ab
Artifact deletion in actions ui (#27172)
Add deletion link in runs view page.
Fix #26315

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/2142787/aa65a4ab-f434-4deb-b953-21e63c212033)

When click deletion button. It marks this artifact `need-delete`.

This artifact would be deleted when actions cleanup cron task.
2024-02-23 09:06:14 +01:00
Panagiotis "Ivory" Vasilopoulos 1668904513 [UI] Actions: Link to Workflow in View 2024-02-22 13:18:06 +01:00
wxiaoguang 65248945c9
Refactor locale&string&template related code (#29165)
Clarify when "string" should be used (and be escaped), and when
"template.HTML" should be used (no need to escape)

And help PRs like  #29059 , to render the error messages correctly.

(cherry picked from commit f3eb835886031df7a562abc123c3f6011c81eca8)

Conflicts:
	modules/web/middleware/binding.go
	routers/web/feed/convert.go
	tests/integration/branches_test.go
	tests/integration/repo_branch_test.go
	trivial context conflicts
2024-02-16 15:20:52 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 8075721823
Minor cleanup in ViewLatestWorkflowRun
Use `ctx.ServerError` instead of a separate `log.Error` + `ctx.Error`.
`ctx.ServerError` does essentially the same thing, but better.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-02-13 23:20:16 +01:00
Gergely Nagy 5f2d8be38e
[FEAT]: New route to view lates run of specific workflows
This adds a new route at `/actions/workflows/{workflow}/runs/latest`,
which will redirect to the latest run of the given workflow. It can be
further restricted by specifying an optional `?branch={branch}` query
parameter. If no branch is specified, the route defaults to using the
repo's default branch.

This route is meant to go hand in hand with the Badge route that returns
the result of the same workflow as a badge. This route can be used to
link to the run that produced that result.

Fixes #2303.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
2024-02-10 09:15:58 +01:00
Gergely Nagy fa0759962b
[GITEA] allow viewing the latest Action Run on the web
Similar to how some other parts of the web UI support a `/latest` path
to directly go to the latest of a certain thing, let the Actions web UI
do the same: `/{owner}/{repo}/actions/runs/latest` will redirect to the
latest run, if there's one available.

Fixes gitea#27991.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit f67ccef1dd3146b0b942a94e2482b37595180e91)

Code cleanup in the actions.ViewLatest route handler

Based on feedback received after the feature was merged, use
`ctx.NotFound` and `ctx.ServerError`, and drop the use of the
unnecessary `ctx.Written()`.

Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
(cherry picked from commit 74e42da5630f9148faaf6b03bf1ac5724fa86b25)
(cherry picked from commit f7535a1cef96ce0589f37907f88b024cd095d0ac)
(cherry picked from commit 1a90cd37c31a1b9c770d6d79a4663ed8d67845c0)
(cherry picked from commit d86d71340afd372e5b5083d5563c2f5b48d975e6)
(cherry picked from commit 9e5cce1afccebcd6146e5e0d364bfdbb840b5276)
(cherry picked from commit 2013fb3fab5e23d0088434d835411f26a3fd9905)
(cherry picked from commit 88b9d21d1194abd133c3b4cbaa19792da433cb43)
(cherry picked from commit 72c020298eebcb0c90e23e7ff35e37be867afc44)
(cherry picked from commit 6525f730dfdd7cb412762d9e30348801335d17ee)
2024-02-05 16:09:41 +01:00
yp05327 07ba4d9f87
Fix incorrect action duration time when rerun the job before executed once (#28364)
Fix #28323
Reason was mentioned here:
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/28323#issuecomment-1841867298

### Changes: (maybe breaking)
We can rerun jobs in Gitea, so there will be some problems in
calculating duration time.
In this PR, I use the exist `Started` and `Stopped` column to record the
last run time instead of the total time,
and add a new `PreviousDuration` column to record the previous duration
time.
You can also check the cost time of last run:

![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/18380374/2ca39145-2c92-401a-b78b-43164f7ae061)
2024-01-19 14:05:49 +00:00
Lunny Xiao df1e7d0067
Use db.Find instead of writing methods for every object (#28084)
For those simple objects, it's unnecessary to write the find and count
methods again and again.
2023-11-24 03:49:41 +00:00
JakobDev cc5df26680
Even more db.DefaultContext refactor (#27352)
Part of #27065

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-10-03 10:30:41 +00:00
FuXiaoHei 460a2b0edf
Artifacts retention and auto clean up (#26131)
Currently, Artifact does not have an expiration and automatic cleanup
mechanism, and this feature needs to be added. It contains the following
key points:

- [x] add global artifact retention days option in config file. Default
value is 90 days.
- [x] add cron task to clean up expired artifacts. It should run once a
day.
- [x] support custom retention period from `retention-days: 5` in
`upload-artifact@v3`.
- [x] artifacts link in actions view should be non-clickable text when
expired.
2023-09-06 07:41:06 +00:00
yp05327 a4a567f29f
Check disabled workflow when rerun jobs (#26535)
In GitHub, we can not rerun jobs if the workflow is disabled.

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-08-22 10:30:02 +08:00
a1012112796 19872063a3
add disable workflow feature (#26413)
As title, that's simmilar with github.


![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/25342410/9e8b2444-63e0-4e87-80da-730c1e4d09d6)



![image](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/assets/25342410/6c3a3345-3ba7-48c9-9acd-3e621632491b)

---------

Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Jason Song <i@wolfogre.com>
2023-08-14 15:14:30 +00:00
FuXiaoHei f3d293d2bb
Actions Artifacts support uploading multiple files and directories (#24874)
current actions artifacts implementation only support single file
artifact. To support multiple files uploading, it needs:

- save each file to each db record with same run-id, same artifact-name
and proper artifact-path
- need change artifact uploading url without artifact-id, multiple files
creates multiple artifact-ids
- support `path` in download-artifact action. artifact should download
to `{path}/{artifact-path}`.
- in repo action view, it provides zip download link in artifacts list
in summary page, no matter this artifact contains single or multiple
files.
2023-07-21 10:42:01 +08:00
Vitaliy Filippov f0b773e0ce
Support downloading raw task logs (#24451)
Hi!
This pull request adds support for downloading raw task logs for Gitea
Actions, similar to Github Actions
It looks like the following:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/945339/235376746-405d5019-710b-468b-8113-9e82eab8e752.png)
2023-06-29 10:58:56 +08:00
Zettat123 28077e66c0
Add step start time to ViewStepLog (#24980)
Part of #24876

According to
https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/24876#discussion_r1205565622 , we
need the start time of the step to get the log time offset.
2023-05-29 08:18:36 +00:00
FuXiaoHei c757765a9e
Implement actions artifacts (#22738)
Implement action artifacts server api.

This change is used for supporting
https://github.com/actions/upload-artifact and
https://github.com/actions/download-artifact in gitea actions. It can
run sample workflow from doc
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/storing-workflow-data-as-artifacts.
The api design is inspired by
https://github.com/nektos/act/blob/master/pkg/artifacts/server.go and
includes some changes from gitea internal structs and methods.

Actions artifacts contains two parts:

- Gitea server api and storage (this pr implement basic design without
some complex cases supports)
- Runner communicate with gitea server api (in comming)

Old pr https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/22345 is outdated after
actions merged. I create new pr from main branch.


![897f7694-3e0f-4f7c-bb4b-9936624ead45](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/2142787/219382371-eb3cf810-e4e0-456b-a8ff-aecc2b1a1032.jpeg)

Add artifacts list in actions workflow page.
2023-05-19 21:37:57 +08:00
Jason Song 27a569609c
Check length of LogIndexes in case it is outdated (#24516)
Fix #24458
2023-05-04 23:37:43 -04:00
yp05327 5987f00523
Add rerun workflow button and refactor to use SVG octicons (#24350)
Changes:
- Add rerun workflow button. Then users can rerun the whole workflow by
only one-click.
- Refactor to use SVG octicons in RepoActionView.vue

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/234736083-dea9b333-ec11-4095-a113-763f3716fba7.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/234736107-d657d19c-f70a-42f4-985f-156a8c7efb7a.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/234736160-9ad372df-7089-4d18-9bab-48bca3f01878.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
2023-05-01 22:14:20 +08:00
yp05327 68aac691c1
Add job.duration in web ui (#23963)
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/230532947-271ac389-8134-4c5e-8f2f-ced4a4fd0ebe.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/230532963-e76532c5-7ca1-4b01-ae77-cc1223350fe7.png)

Maybe we can change the location of it.
2023-04-07 18:20:50 -04:00
Jason Song 3e8db31a5b
Refactor commit status for Actions jobs (#23786)
Before:
<img width="353" alt="xnip_230329_163852"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479807-424452df-10fa-45cf-ae4b-09939c0ed54c.png">
After:
<img width="508" alt="xnip_230329_163358"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/228479923-537b54fe-9564-4105-a068-bcc75fa2a7ea.png">

Highlights:
- Treat `StatusSkipped` as `CommitStatusSuccess` instead of
`CommitStatusFailure`, so it fixed #23599.
- Use the bot user `gitea-actions` instead of the trigger as the creator
of commit status.
- New format `<run_name> / <job_name> / (<event>)` for the context of
commit status to avoid conflicts.
- Add descriptions for commit status.
- Add the missing calls to `CreateCommitStatus`.
- Refactor `CreateCommitStatus` to make it easier to use.
2023-03-29 11:27:37 -04:00
yp05327 22fec1650a
Add commit info in action page (#23210)
Add more commit info in action detail page.

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222069905-a5ab28b1-1cea-4eec-b3b9-f1c74145cb82.png)
2023-03-27 18:34:09 +08:00
Jason Song 47b912cd52
Avoid panic caused by broken payload when creating commit status (#23216)
When creating commit status for Actons jobs, a payload with nil
`HeadCommit` will cause panic.

Reported at:
https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/issues/28#issuecomment-732166

Although the `HeadCommit` probably can not be nil after #23215,
`CreateCommitStatus` should protect itself, to avoid being broken in the
future.

In addition, it's enough to print error log instead of returning err
when `CreateCommitStatus` failed.

---------

Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
2023-03-04 02:12:37 -05:00
yp05327 ca84a61761
Add run status in action view page (#23212)
Before:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084932-a7643fbe-2d9f-48db-b25d-74ace49e03f4.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084887-fde3500d-dad3-4902-9c82-c4f71f23f83b.png)

After:

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084565-eeef1110-9d9d-40b4-a26b-fbd5a307f14e.png)

![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/18380374/222084728-6c96d7c1-a399-43d5-8369-392ad5017b7f.png)

---------

Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
2023-03-04 00:41:37 -05:00
Jason Song edf98a2dc3
Require approval to run actions for fork pull request (#22803)
Currently, Gitea will run actions automatically which are triggered by
fork pull request. It's a security risk, people can create a PR and
modify the workflow yamls to execute a malicious script.

So we should require approval for first-time contributors, which is the
default strategy of a public repo on GitHub, see [Approving workflow
runs from public
forks](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/managing-workflow-runs/approving-workflow-runs-from-public-forks).

Current strategy:

- don't need approval if it's not a fork PR;
- always need approval if the user is restricted;
- don't need approval if the user can write;
- don't need approval if the user has been approved before;
- otherwise, need approval.

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217207121-badf50a8-826c-4425-bef1-d82d1979bc81.mov

GitHub has an option for that, you can see that at
`/<owner>/<repo>/settings/actions`, and we can support that later.

<img width="835" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/217199990-2967e68b-e693-4e59-8186-ab33a1314a16.png">

---------

Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
2023-02-24 15:58:49 +08:00
Jason Song b6145bfaa3
Use relative url in actions view (#22675)
Use relative url in actions view.
2023-01-31 22:46:10 +00:00
Jason Song 4011821c94
Implement actions (#21937)
Close #13539.

Co-authored by: @lunny @appleboy @fuxiaohei and others.

Related projects:
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-def
- https://gitea.com/gitea/actions-proto-go
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act
- https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner

### Summary

The target of this PR is to bring a basic implementation of "Actions",
an internal CI/CD system of Gitea. That means even though it has been
merged, the state of the feature is **EXPERIMENTAL**, and please note
that:

- It is disabled by default;
- It shouldn't be used in a production environment currently;
- It shouldn't be used in a public Gitea instance currently;
- Breaking changes may be made before it's stable.

**Please comment on #13539 if you have any different product design
ideas**, all decisions reached there will be adopted here. But in this
PR, we don't talk about **naming, feature-creep or alternatives**.

### ⚠️ Breaking

`gitea-actions` will become a reserved user name. If a user with the
name already exists in the database, it is recommended to rename it.

### Some important reviews

- What is `DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL` in `app.ini` for?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1055954954
- Why the api for runners is not under the normal `/api/v1` prefix?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061173592
- Why DBFS?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1061301178
- Why ignore events triggered by `gitea-actions` bot?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1063254103
- Why there's no permission control for actions?
  - https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/21937#discussion_r1090229868

### What it looks like

<details>

#### Manage runners

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205870657-c72f590e-2e08-4cd4-be7f-2e0abb299bbf.png">

#### List runs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872794-50fde990-2b45-48c1-a178-908e4ec5b627.png">


#### View logs

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205872501-9b7b9000-9542-4991-8f55-18ccdada77c3.png">



</details>

### How to try it

<details>

#### 1. Start Gitea

Clone this branch and [install from
source](https://docs.gitea.io/en-us/install-from-source).

Add additional configurations in `app.ini` to enable Actions:

```ini
[actions]
ENABLED = true
```

Start it.

If all is well, you'll see the management page of runners:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205877365-8e30a780-9b10-4154-b3e8-ee6c3cb35a59.png">


#### 2. Start runner

Clone the [act_runner](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner), and follow
the
[README](https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/src/branch/main/README.md)
to start it.

If all is well, you'll see a new runner has been added:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205878000-216f5937-e696-470d-b66c-8473987d91c3.png">

#### 3. Enable actions for a repo

Create a new repo or open an existing one, check the `Actions` checkbox
in settings and submit.

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879705-53e09208-73c0-4b3e-a123-2dcf9aba4b9c.png">
<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205879383-23f3d08f-1a85-41dd-a8b3-54e2ee6453e8.png">

If all is well, you'll see a new tab "Actions":

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205881648-a8072d8c-5803-4d76-b8a8-9b2fb49516c1.png">

#### 4. Upload workflow files

Upload some workflow files to `.gitea/workflows/xxx.yaml`, you can
follow the [quickstart](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/quickstart)
of GitHub Actions. Yes, Gitea Actions is compatible with GitHub Actions
in most cases, you can use the same demo:

```yaml
name: GitHub Actions Demo
run-name: ${{ github.actor }} is testing out GitHub Actions 🚀
on: [push]
jobs:
  Explore-GitHub-Actions:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - run: echo "🎉 The job was automatically triggered by a ${{ github.event_name }} event."
      - run: echo "🐧 This job is now running on a ${{ runner.os }} server hosted by GitHub!"
      - run: echo "🔎 The name of your branch is ${{ github.ref }} and your repository is ${{ github.repository }}."
      - name: Check out repository code
        uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - run: echo "💡 The ${{ github.repository }} repository has been cloned to the runner."
      - run: echo "🖥️ The workflow is now ready to test your code on the runner."
      - name: List files in the repository
        run: |
          ls ${{ github.workspace }}
      - run: echo "🍏 This job's status is ${{ job.status }}."
```

If all is well, you'll see a new run in `Actions` tab:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884473-79a874bc-171b-4aaf-acd5-0241a45c3b53.png">

#### 5. Check the logs of jobs

Click a run and you'll see the logs:

<img width="1792" alt="image"
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/9418365/205884800-994b0374-67f7-48ff-be9a-4c53f3141547.png">

#### 6. Go on

You can try more examples in [the
documents](https://docs.github.com/en/actions/using-workflows/workflow-syntax-for-github-actions)
of GitHub Actions, then you might find a lot of bugs.

Come on, PRs are welcome.

</details>

See also: [Feature Preview: Gitea
Actions](https://blog.gitea.io/2022/12/feature-preview-gitea-actions/)

---------

Co-authored-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: ChristopherHX <christopher.homberger@web.de>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
2023-01-31 09:45:19 +08:00