pub-solar/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy
5
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/roles/custom/matrix-jitsi/templates/jvb/logging.properties.j2

21 lines
671 B
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

Fix Jitsi logging.properties conditional being interpreted as Jinja code Related to https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/pull/1464
2021-12-15 19:22:29 +00:00
{% raw %}
Jitsi update - sentry logging added
2021-12-15 12:53:29 +00:00
{{ if .Env.SENTRY_DSN | default "0" | toBool }}
handlers=java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler,io.sentry.jul.SentryHandler
{{ else }}
Manage Jitsi configuration by ourselves for most components We do this for 2 reasons: - so we can control things which are not controllable using environment variables (for example `stunServers` in jitsi/web, since we don't wish to use the hardcoded Google STUN servers if our own Coturn is enabled) - so playbook variable changes will properly rebuild the configuration. When using Jitsi environment variables, the configuration is only built once (the first time) and never rebuilt again. This is not the consistent with the rest of the playbook and with how Ansible operates. We're not perfect at it (yet), because we still let the Jitsi containers generate some files on their own, but we are closer and it should be good enough for most things. Related to #415 (Github Pull Request).
2020-03-24 07:35:21 +00:00
handlers= java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
Jitsi update - sentry logging added
2021-12-15 12:53:29 +00:00
{{ end }}
Fix Jitsi logging.properties conditional being interpreted as Jinja code Related to https://github.com/spantaleev/matrix-docker-ansible-deploy/pull/1464
2021-12-15 19:22:29 +00:00
{% endraw %}
Manage Jitsi configuration by ourselves for most components We do this for 2 reasons: - so we can control things which are not controllable using environment variables (for example `stunServers` in jitsi/web, since we don't wish to use the hardcoded Google STUN servers if our own Coturn is enabled) - so playbook variable changes will properly rebuild the configuration. When using Jitsi environment variables, the configuration is only built once (the first time) and never rebuilt again. This is not the consistent with the rest of the playbook and with how Ansible operates. We're not perfect at it (yet), because we still let the Jitsi containers generate some files on their own, but we are closer and it should be good enough for most things. Related to #415 (Github Pull Request).
2020-03-24 07:35:21 +00:00
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = ALL
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = net.java.sip.communicator.util.ScLogFormatter
net.java.sip.communicator.util.ScLogFormatter.programname=JVB
.level=INFO
org.jitsi.videobridge.xmpp.ComponentImpl.level=FINE
Jitsi update - sentry logging added
2021-12-15 12:53:29 +00:00
io.sentry.jul.SentryHandler.level=WARNING
Manage Jitsi configuration by ourselves for most components We do this for 2 reasons: - so we can control things which are not controllable using environment variables (for example `stunServers` in jitsi/web, since we don't wish to use the hardcoded Google STUN servers if our own Coturn is enabled) - so playbook variable changes will properly rebuild the configuration. When using Jitsi environment variables, the configuration is only built once (the first time) and never rebuilt again. This is not the consistent with the rest of the playbook and with how Ansible operates. We're not perfect at it (yet), because we still let the Jitsi containers generate some files on their own, but we are closer and it should be good enough for most things. Related to #415 (Github Pull Request).
2020-03-24 07:35:21 +00:00
# All of the INFO level logs from MediaStreamImpl are unnecessary in the context of jitsi-videobridge.
org.jitsi.impl.neomedia.MediaStreamImpl.level=WARNING
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink