ff204ca32b
Given that we are no longer inspecting the target of the /proc/self/exe symlink, stop asserting that it has any properties. Remove the plumbing for wrappersDir, which is no longer used. Asserting that the binary is located in the specific place is no longer necessary, because we don't rely on that location being writable only by privileged entities (we used to rely on that when assuming that readlink(/proc/self/exe) will continue to point at us and when assuming that the `.real` file can be trusted). Assertions about lack of write bits on the file were IMO meaningless since inception: ignoring the Linux's refusal to honor S[UG]ID bits on files-writeable-by-others, if someone could have modified the wrapper in a way that preserved the capability or S?ID bits, they could just remove this check. Assertions about effective UID were IMO just harmful: if we were executed without elevation, the caller would expect the result that would cause in a wrapperless distro: the targets gets executed without elevation. Due to lack of elevation, that cannot be used to abuse privileges that the elevation would give. This change partially fixes #98863 for S[UG]ID wrappers. The issue for capability wrappers remains. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| doc/manual | ||
| lib | ||
| maintainers | ||
| modules | ||
| tests | ||
| COPYING | ||
| default.nix | ||
| README.md | ||
| release-combined.nix | ||
| release-small.nix | ||
| release.nix | ||
NixOS
NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.
Testing changes
You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually it’s /etc/nixos/configuration.nix). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast.
Reviewing contributions
When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break people’s installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.
Module updates
Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
- CODEOWNERS will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOfandstringtypes are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
mkRenamedOptionModuleWithprovides a way to make option changes backward compatible.
- Ensure that removed options are declared with
mkRemovedOptionModule - Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
- Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.
Sample template for a module update review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments
New modules
New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.
Reviewing process:
- Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
- Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
loaOfandstringtypes are deprecated). - Description, default and example should be provided.
- Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities,
- Ensure that module
metafield is present- Maintainers should be declared in
meta.maintainers. - Module documentation should be declared with
meta.doc.
- Maintainers should be declared in
- Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
- For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.
Sample template for a new module review is provided below.
##### Reviewed points
- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to environment.systemPackages
- [ ] meta.maintainers is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in meta.doc
##### Possible improvements
##### Comments